Review – Court Rulings – Institutions @ Enabling Learning

Assessment Summary

0 of 5 Questions completed

Questions:

You have already completed the assessment before. Hence you can not start it again.

Assessment is loading…

You must sign in or sign up to start the assessment.

You must first complete the following:

Results

Assessment complete. Results are being recorded.

Results

0 of 5 Questions answered correctly

Your time:

You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)

Current
Review
Answered
Correct
Incorrect

Question 1 of 5
1. Question
What did the Supreme Court rule in the 1974 case of Lau v. Nichols?
- A) LEP students are not protected under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- B) SFUSD’s policy of providing no language assistance to LEP students was not discriminatory
- C) Districts have no obligation to provide appropriate language instruction to LEP students
- D) LEP students are protected under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and districts have an obligation to provide appropriate language instruction to LEP students
Correct
Incorrect
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
What did the court find in the 1981 case of Castañeda v. Pickard regarding the method of educating limited English proficient (LEP) students in Texas?
- A) The state's method was constitutional
- B) The state's method was discriminatory and denied LEP students equal educational opportunities
- C) The state's method was appropriate and did not need to be changed
- D. The state's method was determined to be discriminatory, but did not affect LEP students equal educational opportunities
Correct
Incorrect
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
In the 1982 court case Plyler v. Doe, what did the Supreme Court rule regarding the rights of undocumented children to public education?
- A) Undocumented children do not have the right to public education
- B) Undocumented children have the right to public education, but not bilingual education
- C) Undocumented children have the right to public education, including bilingual education
- D) Undocumented children have the right to public education, but schools are not required to provide appropriate educational services
Correct
Incorrect
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
In the 1983 court case Keyes v. School District #1, what did the court rule in regards to the method of educating limited English proficient (LEP) students?
- A) The "sink or swim" approach of providing English-only instruction to LEP students is constitutional
- B) LEP students have the right to equal educational opportunities, and schools must provide bilingual education or other alternative educational programs
- C) LEP students have the right to equal educational opportunities but schools are not required to provide alternative educational programs
- D) LEP students do not have the right to equal educational opportunities
Correct
Incorrect
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
What are some of the provisions of Chapter 89 of the Texas Education Code for other special populations?
- A) Special education programs for students with disabilities
- B) Programs for economically disadvantaged students
- C) Programs for students in juvenile justice facilities
- D) All of the above
Correct
Incorrect

Review – Court Rulings

Review – Court Rulings

Assessment Summary

Information

Results

Results

Categories

1. Question

2. Question

3. Question

4. Question

5. Question